What's In The Bag

Tour Equipment Data

What the tour actually plays, and how it lines up with what the amateur game is paying attention to.

160 players tracked · 1,563 items logged · 33 brands represented · 16 club categories ·Updated May 26, 2026

Tour Usage vs. Amateur Attention

April 2026 tour usage vs. April 2026 DORMIED Index score. Same month, same brands, measured two ways.

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%020406080100 Titleist: 65.0% tour, DI 100.0 Titleist TaylorMade: 43.8% tour, DI 81.7 TaylorMade PING: 34.4% tour, DI 20.1 PING Odyssey: 33.1% tour, DI 3.3 Odyssey Callaway: 27.5% tour, DI 54.8 Callaway Srixon: 14.4% tour, DI 20.1 Srixon Cleveland: 10.6% tour, DI 11.0 Cleveland L.A.B. Golf: 6.3% tour, DI 4.0 L.A.B. Golf PXG: 6.3% tour, DI 20.1 PXG Cobra: 5.6% tour, DI 20.1 Cobra Mizuno: 5.6% tour, DI 16.4 Mizuno Bettinardi: 2.5% tour, DI 7.4 Bettinardi Wilson: 1.9% tour, DI 7.4 Wilson Nike: 1.9% tour, DI 30.1 Nike Bridgestone: 1.3% tour, DI 3.3 Bridgestone Miura: 1.3% tour, DI 13.5 Miura McLaren Golf: 0.6% tour, DI 54.8 McLaren Golf New Level: 0.6% tour, DI 1.5 New Level Krank: 0.6% tour, DI 1.8 Krank Avoda: 0.6% tour, DI 2.7 Avoda Swag Golf: 0.6% tour, DI 11.0 Swag Golf Honma: 0.6% tour, DI 3.3 Honma Tour Usage (%) DI Score

Brands above the dashed line are pro favorites the amateur game underrates. Below: more attention than tour usage. Dot size = player count. Click any dot to view brand page.

This Week's Bag Moves

Equipment changes detected on the most recent update

No bag changes recorded yet. Check back after Tuesday's update.

Most-Used Brand by Category

Player count across current bags

Drivers
1 Titleist 59
2 PING 41
3 Callaway 28
4 TaylorMade 18
5 Srixon 4
6 Cobra 4
7 Mizuno 3
8 PXG 3
Fairway Woods
1 TaylorMade 67
2 Callaway 35
3 PING 34
4 Titleist 31
5 Cobra 5
6 PXG 3
7 Krank 1
8 Srixon 1
Hybrids
1 Titleist 17
2 Callaway 16
3 TaylorMade 6
4 PING 5
5 PXG 2
6 Mizuno 1
7 Wilson 1
Irons
1 Titleist 46
2 Callaway 29
3 PING 25
4 Srixon 23
5 TaylorMade 19
6 Mizuno 9
7 PXG 8
8 Cobra 4
Wedges
1 Titleist 92
2 Callaway 24
3 PING 22
4 Cleveland 17
5 TaylorMade 14
6 Cobra 6
7 PXG 5
8 Mizuno 4
Putters
1 Odyssey 53
2 Titleist 43
3 PING 26
4 TaylorMade 20
5 L.A.B. Golf 10
6 Bettinardi 3
7 PXG 3
8 SISIK 2
Balls
1 Titleist 104
2 Callaway 13
3 Srixon 10
4 TaylorMade 6
5 Bridgestone 5
6 Maxfli 1

139 of 160 players in dataset

Grips
1 Golf Pride 129
2 SuperStroke 43
3 Lamkin 9
4 PING 4
5 IOIomic 1
6 JumboMax 1
7 L.A.B. Golf 1
8 Titleist 1

146 of 160 players in dataset

Shafts
1 True Temper 135
2 Fujikura 88
3 Mitsubishi 72
5 KBS 35
6 Nippon 25
7 Aldila 9
8 UST Mamiya 8

Top Model Per Category

Most-played specific model across all tracked players

Drivers Titleist GT3 14
Fairway Woods TaylorMade Qi10 12
Hybrids Callaway Apex UW 8
Irons Titleist T100 28
Balls Titleist Pro V1 50

Brand Tour Share

Proportional share of bag slots by brand

Clubs (drivers, woods, hybrids, irons, wedges, putters)
Titleist 33% TaylorMade 16% PING 16% Callaway 15% Odyssey 4% Srixon 4% PXG 2% Cobra 2% Other 7%
Grips
Golf Pride 67% SuperStroke 23% Lamkin 5% PING 3% JumboMax 1% Iomic 1% L.A.B. Golf 1% Titleist 1% Other 1%

Spec Notes

Computed from current bag data

9.4°
Avg Driver Loft
Across 162 drivers with parsed loft data
Lowest Driver Loft
The flattest driver currently in play on tour
142 vs 14
3-Wood vs Mini-Driver
142 players carry a traditional 3-wood; 14 carry a mini-driver
44
Players with 7-Wood+
44 players carry a 7-wood or higher on tour this season

Brand Momentum

Tour usage changes

Brand W/WM/M3M
1 Titleist - - -
2 TaylorMade - - -
3 PING - - -
4 Odyssey - - -
5 Callaway - - -
6 Srixon - - -
7 Cleveland - - -
8 L.A.B. Golf - - -

Change in players carrying brand across all categories. Builds as weekly snapshots accumulate.

Methodology

What This Data Is

The DORMIED WITB dataset tracks the current equipment setup of 160 professional golfers, pulling current bag data on a weekly basis. Each player's bag is recorded at the item level: driver, fairway woods, hybrids, irons, wedges, putter, ball, and grips. Brand, model, shaft, and loft are captured where available. The dataset covers 33 distinct equipment brands and is refreshed every Tuesday at 9am ET.

This is equipment-in-play data, not equipment-sold data. A brand appearing here means a tour-level professional has chosen it in competition - which is a meaningfully different signal than market share, retail velocity, or endorsement deals. Some of the most tour-popular brands barely register in amateur golfers' awareness. That gap is the most interesting thing this page exists to show.

Reading the Tour Usage vs. Amateur Attention Chart

The signature chart plots two independent signals against each other. The X axis is tour usage share: what percentage of the 160 tracked players carry at least one product from that brand in their bag. The Y axis is the DORMIED Index (DI) score for that brand in April 2026, which measures global search interest relative to the highest-scoring brand in the Index that month. Both axes use the same time period.

The dashed diagonal is a reference line, not a regression. Brands sitting above the line are pro favorites the amateur game has not yet matched with search attention - either because the brand does not market aggressively, serves a niche the mainstream has not discovered, or benefits from tour contracts that do not translate to retail awareness. Brands sitting below the line command more amateur attention than their tour presence suggests - often large heritage brands with strong retail and marketing footprints even when pros have shifted toward competitors.

How the Tour-Usage-to-DI Join Works

The WITB brand database maps each equipment brand to its corresponding entry in the DORMIED Index. Not every tour brand has a DORMIED Index entry - particularly grip companies and shaft manufacturers that do not compete in the retail consumer markets tracked by the Index. Brands without a mapping appear in the leaderboards and share views but are excluded from the scatter chart, which requires both a tour usage figure and a DI score to plot. As of this writing, 6 of 33 tracked equipment brands lack a DI mapping; those brands render as plain text throughout this page rather than as hyperlinks to brand pages.

The DORMIED Index measures consumer search interest, not brand sentiment or purchase intent. A high DI score means many people are searching for a brand globally. A low score means the brand is either niche, regional, or simply not a household name outside the sport. For equipment brands especially, the gap between tour presence and public awareness can be dramatic - and that gap tells you something about where the market might be heading, or where it is already moving without the mainstream noticing yet.

Data source: equipment data from PGAClubTracker.com. Consumer search data: DORMIED Index, April 2026 snapshot. All analysis is DORMIED's independent editorial work.