News

The Quiet Business Under Every MyGolfSpy Hybrid Test: Foresight's GCQuad

Foresight's GCQuad sits behind every MyGolfSpy hybrid test, and that placement matters more than the used-club rankings it produces.

Foresight Sports: Launch Monitors Image: MyGolfSpy

Every shot in MyGolfSpy's Most Wanted hybrid testing is captured by a Foresight GCQuad. That placement, buried in the fine print of a used-club buyer's guide published this week, is worth more to Foresight than most tour endorsements the company could buy.

The piece itself is a value-hunting exercise: Cobra DS-Adapt at $149, Sub 70 949X at $89, a Tour Edge Exotics E722 for under a hundred bucks. Useful reading for the golfer trying to plug a long-iron gap without spending flagship money. But the credibility of every recommendation in that article rests on the launch monitor sitting behind the hitting bay. If the GCQuad data is soft, the rankings collapse. MyGolfSpy knows this. So does Foresight.

Camera-based measurement versus radar has been the defining technical debate in launch monitors for the better part of a decade. TrackMan built the tour market on Doppler radar and the credibility that came with PGA Tour ShotLink. Foresight countered with quadrascopic camera technology that captures the ball at impact rather than tracking it downrange, an advantage indoors where radar needs flight distance to resolve accurately. The GCQuad, launched in 2017, made that argument concrete. Nine years later it remains the reference instrument for indoor testing at MyGolfSpy, Golf Digest Hot List labs, and most of the serious independent fitters operating above the Club Champion tier.

What makes the MyGolfSpy placement structurally interesting is the shift in how launch monitor brands reach the enthusiast buyer. Five years ago, Foresight sold almost exclusively to commercial accounts: fitters, ranges, and tour vans. The GC3 at $6,999 and the growing indoor simulator market changed that math. The consumer segment now includes Bushnell Launch Pro (which runs Foresight's ball-reading technology under license), Full Swing's KIT, Uneekor's EYE lineup, and the sub-$1,000 disruptors led by Garmin R10 and Rapsodo. Foresight is no longer the only camera-based option. It is the one that shows up in the testing labs the enthusiast audience trusts.

That trust is the moat. A month-over-month decline in the DORMIED Index reflects the noise of a category getting louder, not a product problem. Bushnell, Full Swing, and Garmin are all spending on awareness in a way Foresight historically has not. The GCQuad's placement in MyGolfSpy testing infrastructure is the counter-move: earned credibility instead of paid impressions. It is the launch monitor version of what Titleist has done with the Pro V1 in the same testing environment, which the article also notes. Both brands understand that being the tool other people use to prove their own claims is worth more than any ad unit.

The near-term test for Foresight is whether the Falcon, the ceiling-mounted unit launched to defend the premium home-simulator segment, holds share against Uneekor and Full Swing at similar price points. The longer test is whether the GCQuad's role as the industry's reference instrument survives another product cycle. As long as MyGolfSpy, Golf Digest, and the top independent fitters keep it in their bays, the answer to the second question is easier than the first.

DORMIED INDEX View Brand →
Global Rank#115
DI Score1.2
M/M Change-18.2%
3M Trend-23.0%
12M Trend-33.3%
ALSO MENTIONED View Brand →
Global Rank#1
DI Score100.0
M/M Change+0.0%
3M Trend+49.8%
12M Trend+0.0%