Twenty-two consecutive starts without a top-10 finish is the kind of streak that eventually forces an equipment conversation. For Jordan Spieth, that conversation now centers on a putter category that has been quietly losing tour share for three years.
Why Is Jordan Spieth Testing a L.A.B. Golf Putter?
Spieth was spotted testing a L.A.B. Golf VZN.1i at the Travelers Championship. He did not put it in play, shot his way to a T66 out of 72, and lost strokes on the greens doing it. The story is not that Spieth tested a zero-torque mallet. The story is that Spieth, whose Scotty Cameron 009 Prototype is one of the most identifiable putters in the sport's last twenty years, is now publicly sampling the category most responsible for pulling business away from Scotty's heel-toe blades.
The historical parallel worth flagging: Tiger Woods played a Scotty Cameron Newport 2 GSS for essentially his entire prime, and that single WITB image did more for the Newport 2 franchise than any marketing spend could. Spieth's 009 has functioned the same way for the Circle T prototype market, where secondary prices routinely clear five figures. When the face of a putter model stops using it, the halo does not disappear immediately, but it thins. Spieth already benched the 009 at the 2025 WM Phoenix Open for a hand-forged TP Mills blade. That was the first crack. A move to L.A.B. would be the wall.
How Fast Is the Zero-Torque Putter Taking Tour Share?
The broader category math is the real issue. L.A.B. Golf went from a curiosity to a top-three tour putter count in roughly 24 months. Odyssey's Ai-ONE and the resurgence of high-MOI mallets have compressed the tour blade segment to a smaller group of holdouts than at any point in the modern era. Scotty Cameron's tour presence remains substantial, but the trajectory of blade usage among players under 35 is not ambiguous. Testing data on blade versus zero-torque and high-MOI designs continues to favor the newer geometry for the average stroke, and tour players are, statistically, closer to average strokes than the marketing suggests.
Scotty Cameron's DORMIED rank sits at seventh globally, down 17.7 percent month-over-month, which reflects a broader softness in the brand's share of the conversation rather than any single event. The brand is not in trouble. Titleist's putter business is structurally sound, the custom shop remains a demand engine, and the Phantom mallet line has been a legitimate answer to the category shift. But the Phantom is not what Spieth is testing. The players who might once have moved from a 009 to a Phantom X are increasingly skipping that step and going to L.A.B., Bettinardi's counterbalanced options, or Odyssey's Ai-ONE Square.
Why Would a Spieth Switch Hurt Scotty Cameron?
The question Scotty Cameron's product team has to be asking: what does the next generation of tour-caliber blade actually look like, and is there enough demand left to justify engineering it? The custom shop can sustain the collector economy indefinitely. The tour van is a different problem. If Spieth switches, the visual of that switch, on broadcast, in every WITB post, in every YouTube gear breakdown, does damage that a new Phantom launch cannot immediately offset.
Spieth may never leave the blade. Comfort at his level is not a small variable, and the TP Mills is still in the bag. But the category has moved, the data has moved, and the most iconic blade user in the sport is publicly testing alternatives. Watch the next four events. If the 009 stays benched and the L.A.B. shows up in play, Scotty Cameron's next tour putter conversation stops being about which blade wins majors and starts being about whether blades win at all.
