News

The Fitzpatrick Bag Split Shows Where Shaft Loyalty Still Lives on Tour

Matt Fitzpatrick plays Mitsubishi Tensei Orange while brother Alex uses Fujikura Ventus Black. What the shaft split says about Tour equipment trends.

Mitsubishi Golf — Shafts Image: MyGolfSpy

Brothers sharing a Zurich Classic trophy but not a single shaft brand tells you something about how Tour equipment decisions actually get made. Matt Fitzpatrick runs Mitsubishi Tensei Orange through his entire wood setup. Alex Fitzpatrick plays Fujikura Ventus Black from driver through 9-wood. Same family, same tournament win, completely different philosophies on what goes between the clubhead and the hands.

The shaft split is the real story here, not the fairway wood configuration that most WITB coverage will focus on. Matt Fitzpatrick has been a Mitsubishi loyalist for years, and the Tensei Orange profile has become his baseline for launch and spin consistency across the bag. That kind of shaft uniformity is increasingly rare on Tour, where most players mix profiles based on club-by-club fitting rather than brand loyalty. Fitzpatrick's approach is almost old-school in its commitment to a single shaft DNA.

Mitsubishi's position in the premium shaft market has been under pressure from Fujikura's Ventus line for several seasons now. The Ventus Black became the default Tour shaft for players seeking low spin and stable tip sections, and its adoption rate among younger Tour players has been significant. Alex Fitzpatrick's choice to build his entire wood setup around Ventus Black is consistent with that trend. He is part of a generation that came up fitting into Ventus rather than away from it.

The broader equipment picture reveals how much the Fitzpatrick setups diverge beyond shafts. Matt carries split-generation PING irons, the i210 and S55, models that have been out of the current lineup for years. This is a player who does not chase new releases. His Bettinardi BB1 Fitz putter is a custom collaboration that has been in the bag long enough to be considered settled equipment rather than sponsorship obligation. The Titleist GT3 driver has the most Tour wins in 2026, which validates the choice but probably did not drive it. Fitzpatrick played this setup because it works, not because the data said it would.

Alex Fitzpatrick's bag reads like a modern fitting session output. The 3-wood, 7-wood, 9-wood configuration gives him three distinct launch windows for approach shots, and the 9-wood in particular has become a Tour trend worth tracking. Players are finding that high-lofted fairway woods offer more stopping power than long irons or hybrids, especially on firm greens. The Titleist T100 irons are the current Tour standard, and the Odyssey Ai-One putter reflects the mallet-with-insert direction that Callaway has been pushing in its Odyssey line.

What makes this comparison useful is what it says about equipment philosophy at the highest level. Matt Fitzpatrick is a control-first player who builds his bag around consistency and familiarity. He is not going to switch shafts because a new profile tests well in a fitting van. Alex Fitzpatrick is still in the accumulation phase of his career, building a setup that maximizes options rather than optimizing for a single shot shape. Both approaches work. Neither is wrong.

Mitsubishi's appearance in Matt Fitzpatrick's bag matters for the brand's Tour visibility, but the contrast with his brother's Fujikura setup is a reminder that shaft loyalty is not inherited. Every player makes their own call, and the younger generation is making different calls than the players who came up a decade earlier. Mitsubishi's challenge is not defending its position with established players. It is earning consideration from the players who are still building their bags.

The Zurich Classic win puts both setups in the spotlight, but the long-term story is whether Mitsubishi can close the gap with Fujikura among players under 30. Matt Fitzpatrick is proof the product works. Alex Fitzpatrick is proof that proof is not enough.

DORMIED INDEX View Brand →
Global Rank#75
DI Score2.2
M/M Change+0.0%
3M Trend+39.4%
12M Trend-18.5%
ALSO MENTIONED View Brand →
Global Rank#48
DI Score4.9
M/M Change+22.3%
3M Trend-6.1%
12M Trend-18.2%
ALSO MENTIONED View Brand →
Global Rank#1
DI Score100.0
M/M Change+49.8%
3M Trend+16.6%
12M Trend+22.4%